[Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Development information and discussion about EDK.
Post Reply
scheffe
Greenhorn
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 14:19

[Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by scheffe »

Greetings,
is there any chance to extend the Feed Syndication Options with additional parameters?
I would like to see the following parameters: Regions, Systems and Corporations

Reason: I would like to have a pure FW killboard but the Feed Syndication cant avoid fetching conterminated killmails ;) ... lot of work every day to keep the FW killboard "clean"

Here are the rules to be included:
Kills and losses against Minmatar and Gallente Militia pilots in any solar system are allowed to be posted.
Kills and losses in all Faction Warfare solar systems are allowed to be posted.
Kills and losses against Pirates outside Faction Warfare solar systems are not allowed to be posted.
Kills and losses against Corporation Wartargets outside Faction Warfare solar systems are not allowed to be posted.
Kills and losses against Mission Wartargets (NPC's) are not allowed to be posted unless you killed a Faction Warfare wartarget or got killed by a Faction Warfare wartarget in the process.

Thank you!
Kovell
Veteran
Posts: 1036
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 13:35

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by Kovell »

Those options won't be added to the feed syndication.

The changes affect very few boards. However they would suit a mod. It would need to change common/post.php to help with manual posts and add a modified feed fetcher and api mod that call a modified feed parser that includes the checks you need.

(Or, and I hate to say it, just modify the core feed parser.)
scheffe
Greenhorn
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 14:19

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by scheffe »

Kovell wrote:However they would suit a mod. It would need to change common/post.php to help with manual posts and add a modified feed fetcher and api mod that call a modified feed parser that includes the checks you need.
(Or, and I hate to say it, just modify the core feed parser.)
Good, thats what I had in mind too. Thank you!

Since I am low on programming skills, anyone here willing to try this [MOD] FW Syndication?
scheffe
Greenhorn
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 14:19

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by scheffe »

Bump!
scheffe
Greenhorn
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 14:19

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by scheffe »

Hello there,
I am about to explode and need something to get stopped this ;)

The nice senseless CCP KM modification, all the "dont care about this senseless CCP KM modification" KB's and the all loved customers who also dont care about rules boosting my cleaning work to a time level I dont want to have.

So my Idea is a page in the admin section of the KB whith some cleansing "push and forget" buttons, but I dont know how to programm this and so I requesting help from the professional coders here.

Most of all I am dealing with the following problem(s):

Problem A
Victim, member of a FW corporations with the wrong alliance in the killmail (crossposted or synced from "dont care about this senseless CCP KM modification" KB's)

Example A
wrong
Tribal Liberation Force , kll_crp_id=8289 / NONE, kll_all_id=14

correct
Tribal Liberation Force , kll_crp_id=8289 / Minmatar Republic, kll_all_id=500

search

Code: Select all

SELECT *  FROM `kb3_kills` WHERE `kll_all_id` = 14 AND `kll_crp_id` = 8289
adjustment

Code: Select all

UPDATE `kb3_kills` SET kll_all_id=500 WHERE `kll_all_id` = 14 AND `kll_crp_id` = 8289
Problem B
Victim, member of a non FW corporations with a system in the killmail (crossposted from "dont care about" customers or synced because of one of the involved has kll_all_id=499) that is not a FW system

Example B
wrong
YZ-LQL , kll_sys_id=4618 / R-I-P, kll_all_id=1064

allowed
YZ-LQL , kll_sys_id=4618 / Minmatar Republic, kll_all_id=500

search

Code: Select all

SELECT *  FROM `kb3_kills` WHERE `kll_all_id` NOT LIKE '500' AND `kll_system_id` = 4618
adjustment
Select all and delete via phpMyAdmin

If someone can help me with a basic page and all the code behind, I am willing to add all the needed system, corporation and alliance ID's ...

Other suggestions?

Thank you!
User avatar
dutch2005
Someday Author
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 21:53
Contact:

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by dutch2005 »

or just join the i dont realy care herd, and just make sure the kb keeps on running....

welcome to the wold of diffrent versions, as long as th killboard doesnt auto-update, this will stay (appart from the fact, this alone would require a 1x update wich loads will not do...)

latest svn has a delete and dont allow repost option, might be a (long) way to fix it?
Image
scheffe
Greenhorn
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 14:19

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by scheffe »

or just join the i dont realy care herd, and just make sure the kb keeps on running...
welcome to the wold of diffrent versions, as long as th killboard doesnt auto-update, this will stay (appart from the fact, this alone would require a 1x update wich loads will not do...)
Well, then I can only say, no wonder why we have so many "dont care" KB's ... :?
latest svn has a delete and dont allow repost option, might be a (long) way to fix it?
A ray of hope ...
badasskitty
Noob
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 17:35

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by badasskitty »

hi there,

that would be a fantastic mod!

customizable filters to the idfeed.

hope someone can make this.
wyattwic
Active Author
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 08:21

Re: [Request] Feed Syndication - Additional Options

Post by wyattwic »

you could just set the posing permissions... That way, only killmails involving FW will be posted.
NOTE: No longer in game!


A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?
Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.
Post Reply